So like I said a while ago, my latest task was to play 10,000 hands at $25nl and then do some statistical analyses. Well, I'm getting close now, sitting at about 9600 hands after playing a little tonight. So I thought it might be nice to start thinking about what analyses I'd actually like to do.
First is the obvious: Statistically, am I a winning player at this level? This should be a fairly straightforward question to answer with the data at hand. I'll also have a point estimate and confidence interval on my winrate.
I'd also like to get winrates and confidence intervals for each position at the table (i.e. big blind, UTG, button, etc). My sample size is obviously going to be a lot smaller for this (should be roughly 1,000 hands per position) but we'll see how wide my confidence intervals are for that.
Finally, I think I'd like to do some analyses examining the pot sizes that I win. Previously (like a long time ago on another site) I used to think I won lots of small pots but then always got it in bad for the big pots. This would obviously be a problem. I haven't thought through exactly how I'll examine this yet, but it should be do-able.
That's about all I can think of for now. I'm sure I'll also just do some data exploration and see what's in there. It might be good to look at hand-specific statistics, i.e. am I losing with AQ, or KQ, or other medium-big hands that I should be winning with? And do I play too much of the junk hands?
After this though, I'm fairly sure I'm going to move up to $50nl. The PokerStars account sits at about $580 right now, so I'm well above Daniel's rules for the move-up. Incidentally, I haven't been able to find any updates lately on his progress.
Anyways, I'll probably start by playing just 1 table at a time for a bit, like 1,000 hands or so. Although that'll be a lot, so maybe a bit less. We'll see...
No comments:
What do you think?